Nikon Z Mirrorless Talk Forum
NoosaPete wrote:
I read so often of all the downfalls of the Nikon Z, APC-S cameras that I feel that I should stand up for them. OK, so the native lens sellection is limited (but there are plenty of fx and third party options) and they don't have in body stabilization but most of the lenses do.
The thing is that I believe that the DX cameras are aimed at people like me - just your average non profesional enthusiast who enjoys taking photos. Very few people except me see the results and when my wife or friends see the odd shot they are usually complimentary. Isn't that all that matters? Of course, if you are a professional photographer that's a different matter.
I have a Z50 and a zfc with the two kit zooms, the 12-28mm and the 24mm prime. Really that covers all I need. Sure, if a new, higher spec Dx comes out I may be tempter (but that will just be GAS.!)
So thank you Nikon. I am enjoying your Z DX cameras.
Happy New Year and best wishes to you all.
I agree that unfortunately the crop frame line does not get much respect. Nikon, like all companies, is looking to maximize revenue and more revenue can be made by selling full frame cameras and lenses.
I still use my Z50 (with the two kit lenses) and acquired a Z30 last year. I was pleasantly surprised by the capabilities of the Z30, and even more surprised that I am able to get consistently good results without a viewfinder. I have the Z 18mm-140mm practically glued on to that camera as it makes for a very small and capable combination when I don't want to carry more.
We might soon see a Z50 II, hopefully with an improved focusing system and IBIS. And many are waiting for the phantom Z500, which will be a popular camera for birders/wildlife photographers and others looking to take advantage of the crop sensor. I believe there is a market for DX cameras and lenses, as not everyone wants to or needs to spend thousands on full frame cameras and lenses.
