XF16-55 2.8 is it too large and conspicuous for travel photography
3 hours ago

I am considering purchasing the XF16-55 f2.8 but I am hoping to hear from others who have used this lens whether it is generally too large and conspicuous for travel photography and candid travel portraits (I usually ask consent to keep the image afterward and delete it if the subject wants me to). The weight is also a consideration but I am less concerned about this overall.

I also have concerns that it is a lot more visible when traveling through countries that have a higher risk of theft. A bigger lens stands out a lot more and looks more expensive.

Thank you for any insight you can provide.

I have mainly used the xf18-55 and never had issues or concerns.